Energy consumption has
doubled worldwide since 1970 and it is believed that it will continue to grow.
Most popular sources of energy on earth are not renewable and have very
damaging influence on our environment. While alternative sources of energy are
becoming quite popular, those are not sufficient to supply current energy needs
of civilization. On the other hand, nuclear fission has a bad reputation due to
some accidents (mainly Chernobyl and Fukushima) and our lack of ability to
recycle nuclear waste. Many people believe that achieving stable, net-positive
nuclear fusion will solve this problem. But how do we know it works ?
Mass-energy equivalence
E = mc^2 is probably the most famous equation of 20th
century that emerges from Einstein’s special theory of relativity. It basically
states that an object standing still in a reference frame, possesses a huge
amount of energy. We can calculate that one gram of mass has energy equivalent to
25.0 million kilowatt-hours. If you
could use 10% of this energy to power your computer, it would run for about
285 years (considering it uses 1kW of power). Theoretically it looks amazing,
ability to change mass to energy would solve all energy problems we can think
of. But how can we release this energy ? The simplest way to do this is nuclear
fission: uranium-235 nucleus after being hit by a neutron with sufficient
energy decays into cesium and rubidium and releases energy; neutrons that will hit other atoms and
start fission in them. Released energy heats water and assuming we can control
this reaction it is possible to connect a turbine and gather power. While the
process itself is quite safe (a nuclear reactor cannot explode like a fission
bomb, a different construction is necessary), we still have to deal with toxic
waste and meltdowns caused by natural disasters (Fukushima) or a human mistake
(Chernobyl).
Creating sun on earth
Another
nuclear process, fusion, is the holy grail of energy industry. It is the same
process that occurs within stars, heating our planet and providing light for
plants to grow. It is like fission watched backwards. Lighter nuclei crash
together with high speed and bound together to form a nucleus of a heavier
element. The mass of the heavier element is lesser than sum of lighter
elements, the missing part is emitted as radiation. This process occurs only in
extreme temperatures, comparable to those on the Sun. While it seems impossible
to achieve such conditions on the Earth, recent developments in the National
Ignition Facility yielded positive results. A small portion of hydrogen
isotopes was heated using powerful laser impulses starting short fusion
reaction that delivered more energy than an amount required to start it. While
those results are promising, this is just the first step to build a hot fusion
reactor.
Cold fusion
While
hot fusion reactors are out of reach for our current technology, several groups
have claimed that they possess working cold fusion reactors. In theory Low
Energy Nuclear Reactions that are claimed to be the base of current prototypes,
would solve all problems with nuclear energy. The fuel would be nickel, there
would be no toxic waste (only copper created from nickel). If estimations are
true, 1% of current nickel production would satisfy worldwide energy needs. But
there is a catch. Many scientists believe that those devices are a scam. There
is no proof that any of these devices work.
Sources & articles worth reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fission
http://www.nature.com/news/laser-fusion-experiment-extracts-net-energy-from-fuel-1.14710
https://climate.nasa.gov/news/864/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption
Sources & articles worth reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fission
http://www.nature.com/news/laser-fusion-experiment-extracts-net-energy-from-fuel-1.14710
https://climate.nasa.gov/news/864/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption