I took the test and I am ESFJ, like Hugo was:) Actually I do believe in so, because we all can see "types" of people. Usually we call it the chemistry between two persons (not only in a romantic way). Is about our believes, habits, opinions... that is why we are choosing some kind of people and prefer to spend time with them more then with others.
But, I think it comes form our childhood. How our parents raised us has a huge impact on our well-behaved and further creating thought lines. however, I know that we are able to change our sociological type by working with ourselves or a psychologist. Sometimes, for example, we are too sensitive to what surrounds us, which causes us a lot of fears. Through practice, we can learn to re-interpret the world, and thus change socionic type :)
I've heard about socionics and socionics test. But I got some strange results ;) ISTP(Gabin) - 115 ISTJ(Maxim Gorky) - 110 INTJ(Robespierre) - 110 So there is no decisive advantage. I honestly do not know what to think about it :)
Well, I'd say your results are not strange at all. Generally each of the letters is actually an axis to which each question you answer contributes to, moving your current result either to the left or to the right. For example first letter is Introverted-Extraverted and you start with score 0. Then each answer for the question that has anything to do with that aspect of personality will move your score to the left (for ex. moving point from 0 to -5) if answer tells us you are Introvertive or to the right (for ex. moving point from 0 to 5) if answer tells us you are Extravertive. So in the end, your scores tell us that: - you are strongly (I)ntrovertive (each test shown that) rather than (E)xtravertive - you are rather (but not overwhelmingly) (S)ensing than I(N)tuitive (2 out of 3 tests) - you are definitely (T)hinking, rather than (F)eeling (3/3) - you are rather (J)udging than (P)erceiving (2 out of 3)
That simply means you have 2 strong personality feats and 2 weaker ones (or maybe not so developed to one way or another). :)
I've never heard the name socionics. There are different types of minds excelling in different fields but i've never thought it can be changed or managed. I always thought that it is something one is born with. It's never too late to learn something new :)
No, I haven’t heard about socionics but it sounded so good to me, so before watch film I did test and I’m ESTP. On second and third position I have INTP and ESFP.
Those three results are very close, base on points. So am I complicated or what? I’m just kidding. After pass (or fail?) test I started digging about socionics, especially about how I could interpret the results. The descriptions are so true, in my opinion. I’m pretty amazed, how people can describe others base on test. Life seems to be more complicated, but surprisingly isn’t. We are like templates. Right before birth, we fill some gaps in those templates. I’m not sure if socionics is a science or just a tale. It could be some subtype of psychology. So if psychology is a science, so socionics also.
I've never heard of term socionics before either, but looking at the article I quickly found out that it's something I'm actively using since middle school for better understanding of my personality (and personalities of others). Model mentioned in the test is actually test for one of 16 personalities in MBTI model. I strongly recommend site https://www.16personalities.com because - in my experience - it has much better tests and way more broad description of what actually results of your tests mean. I used to be INTJ-A that grew to be ENTJ-A (with not so strong 'E', I'd say it depends - I'm extravertive at work and introvertive at home). So it definitely changes throughout our lifetimes, but I would not expect anyone to have some sort of major shift in all of the aspects if not for some traumatic life events. If you want to complement your personality test with different method, I would recommend technique called Enneagram. It gives somehow similar results but from different perspective, because it has 9 personality types + subtypes called 'wings'. It allows you for example to be personality type 7 (Loyalist) with wing to either of your neighbours (6 - Skeptic, 8 - Challenger), resulting in 2 types: 7w6 and 7w8. I think Enneagram is less popular, because it's less scientific than MBTI but still viable for crosschecking with your MBTI results. :)
I have not heard of the word 'socionics'. I've read a bit about interpersonal psychology, are these concepts really different? Effective communication with another person can really be difficult. Assuming that the message has been understood. Lack of assertiveness. Avoiding difficult conversations. These are probably the basic problems that I remembered. I'm surprised why we do not learn it in schools. How much more pleasant we would be if everyone understood what is going on in effective communication, not only through intuition.
I have heard about the socionics, but I was not aware how it's called. I always thought about it as a kind of psychological test. I've took the test from the article. My results: INTJ(Robespierre) - 270 ISTJ(Maxim Gorky) - 265 INFJ(Dostoyevsky) - 245
2 out of 3 were writers. Not bad I'd say. According to the infromation INTJ is also called 'Architect'. INTJ can achive every target with proper attitude. The Architect is also full of contradictions, but such a specific contradictions which can be explained rationally. I'm not sure how they marked some of the people as INTJ, but accoridng to the website Wlater White from Breaking Bad and Gandalf from Lord of the Rings are also INTJ. I must say I'm in quite nice companionship.
I don't heard word called "socionics". For me it is something like body language (in that case mind language) connected with philosophy. You know that somebody is nice to you, but you wonder about reason why he or she is kind to you. I suppose that it is very easy to learn "socionics". But there is one circumstance - you must be patient (when it is hard for you to learn new things, and you aren't good observer).
I took the test and I am ESFJ, like Hugo was:)
ReplyDeleteActually I do believe in so, because we all can see "types" of people. Usually we call it the chemistry between two persons (not only in a romantic way). Is about our believes, habits, opinions... that is why we are choosing some kind of people and prefer to spend time with them more then with others.
But, I think it comes form our childhood. How our parents raised us has a huge impact on our well-behaved and further creating thought lines. however, I know that we are able to change our sociological type by working with ourselves or a psychologist. Sometimes, for example, we are too sensitive to what surrounds us, which causes us a lot of fears. Through practice, we can learn to re-interpret the world, and thus change socionic type :)
I've heard about socionics and socionics test. But I got some strange results ;)
ReplyDeleteISTP(Gabin) - 115
ISTJ(Maxim Gorky) - 110
INTJ(Robespierre) - 110
So there is no decisive advantage. I honestly do not know what to think about it :)
Well, I'd say your results are not strange at all.
DeleteGenerally each of the letters is actually an axis to which each question you answer contributes to, moving your current result either to the left or to the right.
For example first letter is Introverted-Extraverted and you start with score 0. Then each answer for the question that has anything to do with that aspect of personality will move your score to the left (for ex. moving point from 0 to -5) if answer tells us you are Introvertive or to the right (for ex. moving point from 0 to 5) if answer tells us you are Extravertive.
So in the end, your scores tell us that:
- you are strongly (I)ntrovertive (each test shown that) rather than (E)xtravertive
- you are rather (but not overwhelmingly) (S)ensing than I(N)tuitive (2 out of 3 tests)
- you are definitely (T)hinking, rather than (F)eeling (3/3)
- you are rather (J)udging than (P)erceiving (2 out of 3)
That simply means you have 2 strong personality feats and 2 weaker ones (or maybe not so developed to one way or another). :)
I've never heard the name socionics. There are different types of minds excelling in different fields but i've never thought it can be changed or managed. I always thought that it is something one is born with. It's never too late to learn something new :)
ReplyDeleteNo, I haven’t heard about socionics but it sounded so good to me, so before watch film I did test and I’m ESTP. On second and third position I have INTP and ESFP.
ReplyDeleteESTP(Zhukov) - 260
INTP(Balzac) - 250
ESFP(Napoleon) - 245
Those three results are very close, base on points. So am I complicated or what? I’m just kidding. After pass (or fail?) test I started digging about socionics, especially about how I could interpret the results. The descriptions are so true, in my opinion. I’m pretty amazed, how people can describe others base on test. Life seems to be more complicated, but surprisingly isn’t. We are like templates. Right before birth, we fill some gaps in those templates. I’m not sure if socionics is a science or just a tale. It could be some subtype of psychology. So if psychology is a science, so socionics also.
I've never heard of term socionics before either, but looking at the article I quickly found out that it's something I'm actively using since middle school for better understanding of my personality (and personalities of others).
ReplyDeleteModel mentioned in the test is actually test for one of 16 personalities in MBTI model. I strongly recommend site https://www.16personalities.com because - in my experience - it has much better tests and way more broad description of what actually results of your tests mean.
I used to be INTJ-A that grew to be ENTJ-A (with not so strong 'E', I'd say it depends - I'm extravertive at work and introvertive at home). So it definitely changes throughout our lifetimes, but I would not expect anyone to have some sort of major shift in all of the aspects if not for some traumatic life events.
If you want to complement your personality test with different method, I would recommend technique called Enneagram.
It gives somehow similar results but from different perspective, because it has 9 personality types + subtypes called 'wings'. It allows you for example to be personality type 7 (Loyalist) with wing to either of your neighbours (6 - Skeptic, 8 - Challenger), resulting in 2 types: 7w6 and 7w8.
I think Enneagram is less popular, because it's less scientific than MBTI but still viable for crosschecking with your MBTI results. :)
I have not heard of the word 'socionics'. I've read a bit about interpersonal psychology, are these concepts really different? Effective communication with another person can really be difficult.
ReplyDeleteAssuming that the message has been understood.
Lack of assertiveness.
Avoiding difficult conversations.
These are probably the basic problems that I remembered. I'm surprised why we do not learn it in schools. How much more pleasant we would be if everyone understood what is going on in effective communication, not only through intuition.
I have heard about the socionics, but I was not aware how it's called. I always thought about it as a kind of psychological test. I've took the test from the article. My results:
ReplyDeleteINTJ(Robespierre) - 270
ISTJ(Maxim Gorky) - 265
INFJ(Dostoyevsky) - 245
2 out of 3 were writers. Not bad I'd say. According to the infromation INTJ is also called 'Architect'. INTJ can achive every target with proper attitude. The Architect is also full of contradictions, but such a specific contradictions which can be explained rationally. I'm not sure how they marked some of the people as INTJ, but accoridng to the website Wlater White from Breaking Bad and Gandalf from Lord of the Rings are also INTJ. I must say I'm in quite nice companionship.
Unfortunately I have never heard about socionics.
ReplyDeleteI am супер соціоніка person!
Probably it's just a tale but lesbomancy is my favourite
part of magic.
I don't heard word called "socionics". For me it is something like body language (in that case mind language) connected with philosophy. You know that somebody is nice to you, but you wonder about reason why he or she is kind to you. I suppose that it is very easy to learn "socionics". But there is one circumstance - you must be patient (when it is hard for you to learn new things, and you aren't good observer).
ReplyDelete